01
Structured intake
Deal type, jurisdiction, parties, confidential information, duration, and special requirements become a record the rest of the system can use.
Method
The drafting engine this site is for.
NDA Builder is not “an LLM wrote an NDA.” The product we are building is a hybrid: structured facts, an attorney’s clause library, assisted selection, deterministic assembly, and visible checks—with legal judgment left to a person.
02
Approved clause library
Attorney-approved alternatives, drafting rules, and conditional requirements. The library is the source of language—not a one-off generation.
03
Assisted selection
A model may identify which clauses and options fit the intake. It does not freely rewrite the agreement. Selection is bounded by the library.
04
Deterministic assembly
Templates and document logic control structure, numbering, and formatting so house form does not drift from draft to draft.
05
Style and rule validation
Clause QA checks required provisions and drafting rules. Style QA checks approved language, formatting, punctuation, and structure.
06
Attorney feedback loop
Edits, accepted language, rejected clauses, and approved revisions are captured so the library and checks can improve over time.
What this is not
No substitute for counsel. No guarantee of outcome.
Clause library, not a search slogan
Later phases may retrieve from the attorney’s approved clauses and drafting guidance. That retrieval is a way to keep language inside the library. It is not the product pitch, and this demo does not implement it.
Fine-tuning is an experiment later
Customizing a model on the attorney’s examples is a possible later experiment, after an evaluation set and a reliable validation process exist. It is not how this demo describes the product.
See how a draft is assembled, or the FAQ on Clause QA, Style QA, and attorney review.